[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TV) Re: Tom as a punk
- To: tv@obbard.com
- Subject: Re: (TV) Re: Tom as a punk
- From: postitnote <postitnote@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 14:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1304285099; bh=KiQcFRIL+7m51jklcaiRUCNywjzK4MIOVNmcZBx8nkA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FnMIDXwc9ah6e99jnKqbrzKLIZus7l0qsPfnd3jL/s47xe3E3qY8qz7mw4Lg/ex7xh8Hayu7wwdRyeQEpIqtz5GDvV1D2U0npDcGjApeVrZnki9kd2XvPPCu5oE4648wfKGzXHAkzGqJH2M/UkJn1MDS8QatxiolLQ+eQWPDS0o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=skyc5IYPenQx9qvfOcZpQiP7gMaE/v4qsrY9jiOyqVomcjqRLZPCeqDJ01GqnrUa8wvGtUKtsP57F/pyCjHZj6nBx+j1y8e4+xcGmREcbj6IOPq4G3hjGzz3/Lg+f+RUmCtUqb+80VPw28z7rg2P5g0UG0dmeCX94ADkUEqJjcM=;
- In-reply-to: <591936.97906.qm@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
- Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com
--- On Sun, 5/1/11, Jesse Hochstadt <jesseh58@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Jesse Hochstadt <jesseh58@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (TV) Re: Tom as a punk
To: tv@obbard.com
Date: Sunday, May 1, 2011, 11:58 AM
The best thing you can do is to play the uninitiated some songs by the
musician
in question. Nowadays, if you own an mp3 player (which I don't), that's not
even
that hard. Leo, perhaps you'd have had more luck with those women if you'd
said:
"I'm doing a bad job describing Television. Why don't you come up to my
swinging
bachelor pad, sit on my revolving bed, and I'll show you my etchings" - I
mean,
"play you 'Marquee Moon.'"
Of course there's still the problem of choosing "representative" songs,
especially with someone like Thompson. And for the Mekons, I always say, "You
_really_ have to see them live."
- Jesse
Would this apply to Fugazi too? Or is all 'hardcore' labeled in the
'lunkhead' category? What about the album The Argument or the soundtrack to
The Instrument? I guess people would be turned off because of their label as
hardcore when their later works are different than what people think of as
hardcore.
D.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Rex Broome <rexbroome@gmail.com>
> To: tv@obbard.com
> Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 2:15:58 PM
> Subject: Re: (TV) Re: Tom as a punk
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Jesse Hochstadt <jesseh58@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> >
> > I generally find it hard to label almost any musical performer(s) I like
> > when
> > someone asks me to describe them. Calling Richard Thompson a folk-rocker
> > tells
> > you next to nothing. Calling the Mekons or X punk bands tells you next
to
> > nothing. My sense is that the easier it is to categorize a band or
> > musician, the
> > less interesting they tend to be.
> >
>
> That's well said.
>
> The lunkhead issue persists, though. Richard Thompson's a good example...
> if you're talking to someone who doesn't know who he is, it's going to be
> tough. Your options are basically to start with the term "folk rock" and
> then endeavor to get more specific until their eyes glaze over, or to say
> with greater or lesser candor, "Look, you're a lunkhead, and if we
continue
> this discussion it's probably going to be quite frustrating for both of
us.
> Let's briefly discuss movies and find out if you're clueless about film,
> too."
> --------------
> To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
> To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"