[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (TV) ceci n'est pas un sammy hagar.
- To: tv@obbard.com
- Subject: Re: (TV) ceci n'est pas un sammy hagar.
- From: Phil Obbard <pobbard@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=CyX08jcJnyAr/SuTWijX5+KG5IO6KM+tu/GndG0wFp2QKp/xsrRh6bkQmcDiMAVSCSCFTYjBAuXabceH+kq6kuU8na7+i2awrRsctVNIkNyQahxRxH3wFBjXhvMAuCBL6xjl6yNvynfdIDpN36NSyXYRyPhm/w8PEEZqJwlNHnM=;
- In-reply-to: <68a8ea5e0705041759h168e24adh124f96ea8e15798e@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
- Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com
I think a Lloyd-less Television is very unlikely, unless Tom, Fred,
or Billy really need the money at some future date.
When Lloyd left Television (briefly) in August of 1975, flyers for
upcoming Television shows were changed to promote "The Tom Verlaine
Band". (Lloyd returned before any shows were actually played).
--Philip
--- Rex Broome <rexbroome@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/4/07, Russ <russvr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 'm sure that if Television were to
> > continue on, and replaced Lloyd, I'm sure the replacement would
> be someone
> > worthy of Lloyd. I don't want to speculate who that might be
> right now.
>
>
> Erm, I don't think a Lloydless Television would advisable, but the
> obvious
> answer would be Mr. Rip(p), who has shown himself to be, at times,
> just as
> sympatico with Tom as Richard. But then one would be hard pressed
> to
> identify half of Tom's solo bands, retroactively, as anything other
> than
> Television.
>
> I really don't know what to make of any of this.
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"