[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(TV) To indulge my subjectivity the glaring omissions for me are:

To: <tv@obbard.com>
Subject: (TV) To indulge my subjectivity the glaring omissions for me are:
From: "Scott Simpson" <SSimpson@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:44:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <44BAA2E8.4040205@madasafish.com>
Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com
Thread-index: AcapF1AcvKzib59BTjKchyw8QhmHSQAALkYg

BTW, this has been a fun thread:

The B-52s
Wasn't Tomorrow Wonderful?  (But I realize it will take still a few more
decades for The Waitresses to get their props.)

Entertainment!  Psychocandy.  Not in the top ten?  Do you have to take a
shit on the dinner table to get noticed these days?

Scott, NYC
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"

Follow-Ups:
- (TV) To indulge my subjectivity the glaring omissions for me are: PT II
  - From: "Scott Simpson" <SSimpson@nyc.rr.com>

References:
- Re: (TV) It's Not 'fly-around' it's 'Around'
  - From: Graham Urquhart <gurquhart@madasafish.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (TV) It's Not 'fly-around' it's 'Around'
Next by Date: Re: (TV) It's Not 'fly-around' it's 'Around'
Previous by thread: Re: (TV) It's Not 'fly-around' it's 'Around'
Next by thread: (TV) To indulge my subjectivity the glaring omissions for me are: PT II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread