[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (TV) Pitchforkmedia reviews Verlaine (mixed)



Perhaps it was a bit of an overreaction - maybe - but there are things with that review I do not agree with, that I think are qualitatively wrong. Let me list the ways:
1. Unfair to compare Tom with the many artists he's influenced over the 
years. Tom is Tom, he's not trying to be Luna.
2. The reviewer states "the chemistry is not there" but he does not 
explain why he feels this way. Billy Ficca and the other mentioned 
musicians have been playing with Tom for a long time. These folks are 
seasoned professionals . The reviewer needs to back up his opinions with 
something.
3. The reviewer dismisses the instrumental album out of hand. Granted 
the two records are likely to be pretty different . Perhaps the reviewer 
was the wrong person to review that particular record seeing that it's 
obviously not his kind of music. I will also grant that Tom's 
instrumental music divides us up here on the list into camps pro and con.
5. "Dim and winking" ? This person doesn't appreciate Verlaine. 
Appreciate in the sense that he has any experience listening to Tom's 
work other than the first two Television records and maybe his first 
solo record. It's so hack to compare what he's doing now with what he 
did 30 years ago.
Don't get me wrong, I love freedom of the press. I will defend to the 
death for that right  - we might all have to in the not too distant 
future...but leave it to Pitchfork to assign someone with no real 
understanding to review someone like Verlaine, who, by virtue of his 
genius ( why after all do we subscribe to this list if we do not believe 
that ?) deserves better treatment. Maybe I'm with TV when he says 'the 
press, they only deserve lies' ;-) . Also, the little that I've heard of 
the two records, I *do* think they deserve a wide hearing, I *do* think 
this is a seismic scale event !
Okay, I'm off my soap box. And I'm glad we can all disagree from time to 
time - even with reviewers.
- Russ


Joe Thornton wrote:
Have to agree with Keith here.

Well, to be honest, I didn't think it was _that_ unfair.

But someone with only glancing or informal familiarity with TVs music is going to think twice about purchasing these records if they read the review. I think it's shameful.
But that would mean that reviewers should tell everyone to buy 
everything because somebody, somewhere, thinks it's brilliant.
Russ, I think you overreacted...

--JoeT
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"