[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (TV) always with the coruscating
- To: tv@obbard.com
- Subject: RE: (TV) always with the coruscating
- From: Phil Obbard <pobbard@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sIGtdRX6RW6rJTNKdCf1D6iCrB+jdcdR8s3VTtDCcLjzICVmRK4hVUit1KvuP6lFDH3CQ9p9FI21X7absYaRfKtOGdZ0f8HZzlKut/LMkXde7fjfIF/s1dhVWCbZz+g1t//zPiXf3NRJt7uQZqLnamCUT5glIF93gSJPM+906Nw= ;
- In-reply-to: <auto-000128497412@easily.co.uk>
- Reply-to: tv@obbard.com
- Sender: tv-owner@obbard.com
It is, and the fine is $50 - payable to me.
:^)
--Phil
--- Howard Webb <howard@howardwebb.com> wrote:
> After I sent that email I wondered if "seminal" was on a list of
> banned words for this mailing list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tv-owner@obbard.com [mailto:tv-owner@obbard.com] On Behalf Of
> Keith
> Allison
> Sent: 24 June 2005 16:38
> To: tv@obbard.com
> Subject: Re: (TV) always with the coruscating
>
> In message <auto-000128495669@easily.co.uk>, Howard Webb
> <howard@howardwebb.com> writes
> >Very useful to know - but does this mean that coruscating is the
> new
> >seminal?
>
> God, I hope not.
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> http://www.marquee.demon.co.uk
> "The Wonder - Tom Verlaine, Television & Stuff"
> -----------------------------------------------
> --------------
> To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
> To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe
> tv"
--------------
To post: Mail tv@obbard.com
To unsubscribe: Mail majordomo@obbard.com with message "unsubscribe tv"